The child’s constitutionally protected rights to family and parental care needed to be protected where a husband claimed the return of maintenance payments made in the mistaken belief that he was the father.
MN v AJ 2013 (3) SA 26 (WCC)
The child’s constitutionally protected rights to family and parental care needed to be protected where a husband claimed the return of maintenance payments made in the mistaken belief that he was the father.
MN v AJ 2013 (3) SA 26 (WCC)